. . . Continued
Older'n Dirt wrote,10:56:09 AM:
"Lloyd Macilquham cicblog said:" If there were an election Harper could win a majority, especially if the electorate perceived the Liberals as causing it. This would be a disaster to freedoms and Democracy in Canada. Our society would degenerate to a new dark ages."...............................
Is this an exercise in faulty reasoning? 1st you say that Harper could get his majority through a democratic election process. Then you go on to suggest that such would be a disaster to freedoms and Democracy in Canada. "
One need only remember that H[redacted]r was duly elected by democracy process to illustrate my point and highlight in sensational fashion the flaw in your reasoning. (Be it far from me to suggest a comparison between Harper and H[redacted]r. But riddle me this, what is a 6 letter word, that starts with 'H' and ends with 'r' and represent tyrannical rule.)
My post is clear that I am talking not about the process underlying of attaining power. Harper right now is in power as a result of Canadians exercising their democracy rights. And we need only see the assault on our freedoms and Democratic Institutions he is inflicting with a minority to imagine the disaster to disaster to freedoms and Democracy in Canada if he had a majority. The abortion issue is merely one example.
Like the spin strategy of so many Con's you seem to be deliberately missing the point and throwing up a straw issue to attack in an attempt to obfuscate and obscure the real issue.
I am quite willing to let the the general public read my post and yours and make their own minds up as to what I am saying, its logic and the reality of it.
And I am quite willing to stand up and be counted.
You, apparently, don't even have to conviction of your opinion to give your name, Mr./Ms.'Older'n Dirt'.
Lloyd MacILquham cicblog.com/comments.html