Rumours of coup greatly exaggerated, Rae says, JANE TABER,
Dec. 12, 2009
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/rumours-of-coup-greatly-exaggerated-rae-says/article1398289/
A few days ago I posted something to Jane Taber's article and entitled it
"This is to all the 'Lame Sabers' in the Canadian Media"
I wrote:
"One can only wonder to what extent, given the huge amounts of tax payers money, as well as Con Party money, Harper spends on media - central to the smooth running of their propaganda machine, the Harper and Con largess is tied to media that publish pro-Con materials.
It's pathetic commentary on the Canadian Media when Canadians have to rely on the International Media to get a truth picture and perspective of the damage that Harper, MacKay, O'Connor, Flaherty, Baird, and all the Con's are doing to not only our International image, but this great nation of ours."
It is outrageous to think of how our forefathers and mothers expended their blood, sweat and tears to build our nation over many generations and how Harper and his position on Global Warming, his mind boggling budget deficits, which Harper and the Con's are spending as if it were their own, are destroying in a few, not so short, years. God save Canada!"
While I was writing it I sneezed 'ah ah aaaa "Lame Saber" chooo'
Within 20 minutes I had received over 225 'Downs' and one Up - (Thanks Mom)
I wanted to see what was going on so I posted essentially the same thing again. In the next hour or so it had received 6 Down, (and 2 Up - Mom, you can't vote twice, even if you are in heaven). Then it was pulled down.
I speculated that it was not likely Liberals, NDP or Con's.
That doesn't leave much else.
The reason I am posting this
. . . ah ah aaaa "Lame Saber" chooo, sorry sneezed again.
You be the judge.
Oh, and did I mention, Jane Taber is incredibly biased towards the Con's, which explains this article - anything to try to undermine confidence in the Liberals
Perhaps Lady Jane sees the writing on the wall and is looking for some job security in the Senate.
I wonder if this will get pulled down. Let's see.
Lloyd MacIlquham cicblog.com/comments.html