- Obama Doesn't Subscribe to the Harper Right-Wing Extremism? The Devil You say!

Posted: 12:39 PM on October 17, 2010, the Globe and Mail
U.S. pledged to back Canada's failed UN bid, minister says, Mike Blanchfield, Oct. 16, 2010
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/us-pledged-to-back-canadas-failed-un-bid-minister-says/article1758694/

First it was Ignatieff and the Liberal Party influencing the whole world.

Now it is Obama not only doing Ignatieff's bidding but co-ordinating it.

Even I don't think that Ignatieff and the Liberals have that much influence.

On the other hand, if they do then perhaps we, all Canadians, should take a serious look at why everyone else in the world is choosing Micheal Ignatieff and the Liberal Party and rebuking Stephen Harper and the Conservative Party.

No matter what we should take a serious, hopefully not too long, look at why Harper and his right-wing extremist policies have received such a extreme rebuke.

I think a more logical explanation is that this is 'uberic hyperbola' by right wing extremists, intended for consumption by their supporters to rationalize and animate, keeping in mind that Con'ism originates in the US and there are many, many old supporters of George W. Bush that hang their hopes on Harper the Con movement in Canada.

Richard Grenell: “Some conservatives in Canada believe that the Obama team worked with Canadian liberals to leave Prime Minister Stephen Harper's conservative government hanging without vocal U.S. support. In the past, American ambassadors around the globe were instructed by Washington and led by the U.S. Mission to the UN to work aggressively behind the scenes rallying capitals around the world to support certain countries in crucial Security Council elections.”

How many people are surprised that a main proponent of this 'con', Richard Grenell, served during the Bush administration and his allegation were broadcast on the Fox News Website.

If Obama did, in fact, instruct his diplomats to"'to not get involved' in Canada's campaign for a temporary, two-year seat on the powerful council", and I find it implausible, (thus violates the Flanagan Spin Principle),

It is far more logical, and likely, to assume there is a simple reason -

Perhaps, Obama

- does not subscribe the the extremist, right-wing Con ideology that Harper and the Con's in Canada stand for

- does not want to be associated with the non compromising, non conciliatory, non tolerant, non flexible and certainly non looking at both sides of an issue to understand the realities and seeking a solution that is for the good of all concerned that is the basis and extent of Harper's International policies.

- rejects the "I'm right - you're wrong", "I'm good you're bad", "you do things my way" approach that is so much a hallmark of Harper's right-wing extremism

Now that would be a surprise . . . not!

excerpt: Lloyd MacILquham cicblog.com/comments.html